BORLAND C++ V2.0 FOR OS/2 MAC
Maybe there's no correlation between their Mac work and their interface, but I found their interface inconvenient. I'm not a Mac user, and don't care for the Symantec interface. The issues for choosing between them have more to do with your work style:ġ.
I've found JBuilder, VAJava, and the Symantec products to be equally stable under NT. (Personally I just use it for videogames and refer to it as my Wintendo box.) I've never found any development environment stable on Win95/98 - it's a deployment platform, not a development platform. Try running on NT with 128M or more of memory. It only shows that Microsoft is morally and intellectually bankrupt, and that tends to taint anyone who defends them by association. One or two companies might be believable as crybabies, but companies like IBM hardly can be categorized that way.Įven if it was just a couple of companies complaining, it still wouldn't make it right for the biggest player (who doesn't need to cheat) to use such tactics. You might have a point if it was just one or two companies, but it is just about the entire computer industry against Microsoft this time, with the exception of the few companies that are completely in Microsoft's pocket. I am not a big fan of government intervention, but in some cases when a market shows it is incapable of correcting itself (which generally only seems to result from gross abuses by the largest player(s)), then unfortunately, government intervention may be the only alternative.Ĭrybaby companies who rely on government intervention because they're losers will always cry 'cheat' if they can. Government intervention is almost never good for business.Īlmost isn't always. They eliminate competition through dirty tactics instead of legitimate competition.
So companies are just supposed to let someone cheat and not say anything? I don't think so. It would only be surprising if when they won, the losers didn't act like the crybabies they are.